20 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Page 1 01'2 Janice Stern From tabelchen©aol.com Sent: 2008 -12.03 17.37 To: Brian Dolan I LETTER 3 I Cc: Janice Stern Subject: Feedback an General Plan DEIR Hello Brian, I've reviewed the 450 page DEIR and have some comments and questions http:Nwsw.ci pleasanton, ca. us/pdf /genplan -DEIR- 2005 -2025. pdf Questior 1: 3.1 I didn't srae any comments regarding the impact of Measures QQ PP to this plan, when will that be incorporated? Comment 1: Guiding objectives for the plan (Pages E.-2 S -3 (PDF page #8) again in section 22 (page 2 -5, #43 on PDF)) Please consider including an additional objective of teaching the students of Pleasanton the 3.z importance of Pleasanton's history and our surrounding environment, Questior 2: For Table S4 (residential buitdoul analysis, page S -20, PDF page #24): What is 'Other Would these include units that would be impacted by Measures QQ PP? The remaining comments are for Section 3.8: Commer t 2: The Calliope Butterfly mentioned In Table 18.1 (bottom of page 3.8 -3, PDF page #225) in Federally ENDANGERED (not Federally Threatened). It's correctly referenced in Appendix C, some proof is here: http:Ress ig_ berkeley .edu /endins/callippe.htm (same site referenced in Appendix C) http:// ea' s. fws. gov/ speciesProfile /SpeciesReport.do ?spcode =1019 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife site) Further: The statement "No Known Occurrences" is not accurate, They were documented by Dr, Arnold at both the proposed Oak Grove site and what Is now Callippe Preserve. For what it's worth, I also have pictures from spring of 2008 of the Callippe Butterfly at the Preserve, I will be working with Janice Stern to have further verification the spring of 2009, Commert 3: Figure 3, 8.1 should also have a reference to the Calllppe or an additional figure should be added. Commert 4: On page 3.8 -12, the DEIR references California Native Plant Society (CNPS) as the authority 2008 1244