Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the O\\mers to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or other- <br />wise and consequently may entail risks of delay. limitation. or modification of their <br />rights. <br /> <br />No Obligation to Tax <br /> <br />The City's obligation to pay the debt service payments does not constitute an obligation of <br />the City for which the City is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation or for which <br />the City has levied or pledged any form of taxation. The obligation of the City to pay debt <br />service payments does not constitute a debt or indebtedness of any city, the State of Cali- <br />fornia or any of its political subdivisions, within the meaning of any constitutional or statu- <br />tory debt limitation or restriction. <br /> <br />Change in Law <br /> <br />In addition to the other limitations described herein. the California electorate or legislature <br />could adopt a constitutional or legislative property tax decrease or an initiative \\ ith the effect <br />of reducing revenues payable to or collected by the City. There is no assurance that the Cali- <br />fornia electorate or legislature \\ill not at some future time approve additional limitations that <br />could reduce the revenues and adversely affect the security of the Bonds, <br /> <br />Constitutional Limit on Appropriations, Fees and Charges <br /> <br />Under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, state and local government entities <br />have an annual "'appropriations limit" which Iirnits their ability to spend certain moneys <br />called "'appropriations subject to limitation:' which consists of tax revenues. certain <br />state subventions and certain other moneys, including user charges to the extent they <br />exceed the costs reasonably borne by the entity in providing the service for which it is <br />levying the charge. In general terms. the "appropriations limit" is to be based on certain <br />1978/79 expenditures, and is to be adjusted annually to reflect changes in population <br />factors and either changes in the cost of living or per capital income. Among other <br />provisions of Article XlIIB. if an entity's revenues in any year exceed the amount permitted <br />to be spent the excess would have to be returned by revising tax rates or fee schedules over <br />the subsequent two years. The City is of the opinion that the rates and user charges imposed <br />by the City in connection \\ith the enterprise do not exceed the costs it reasonably bears in <br />providing such services, <br /> <br />If a portion of the enterprise rates or connection charges were determined by a court to exceed <br />the reasonable costs of providing service, any fee which the City charges may be considered <br />to be a "'special tax," which under Article XIIlA or XIIlD of the California Constitution rnust <br />be authorized by a two-thirds vote of the affected electorate, This requirement is applicable <br />to the City's rates for service provided by the enterprise. The reasonable cost of service <br />provided by the enterprise has been determined by the State Controller to include depre- <br />ciation and allowance for the cost of capital improvements, In addition, the California <br />courts have determined that fees such as connection fees (capacity charges) will not be <br />special taxes if they approximate the reasonable cost of constructing enterprise improve- <br />ments conternplated by the local agency imposing the fee. Such court determinations have <br />been codified in the Government Code of the State of California (Section 66000 et seq.). <br /> <br />18 <br />