Laserfiche WebLink
CEQAFINDINGS <br /> <br />Environmental impact effects and potential mitigation <br />measures are summarized in the Final EIR (pp. 2-1 through 2-9 <br />of the Draft EIR and page AD-1 of the Response to Comments) <br />and are paraphrased herein. The project has been extensively <br />revised relative to the proposal evaluated in the EIR~ <br />references to the revised plan refer to the development plan <br />dated January 1989 and to the conditions of approval applied <br />to the project. <br /> <br />POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS/MITIGATIONS <br /> <br />1. Land Use and Planninu <br /> <br />1.A. $~unificant Effect: Substantial alteration of existing <br /> land use and loss of rural fringe. <br /> <br /> 1.a.1. Findina: The revised plan substantially <br /> lessens this effect. <br /> <br /> Fact: The revised plan eliminates development <br /> in woodland areas and retains open space <br /> along Foothill Road. <br /> <br /> Fact: Reduced density in the revised plan <br /> makes lot sizes/open space consistent <br /> with other similarly designated areas. <br /> <br /> 1.a.2. Findina: The "No Project" alternative is <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> Fact: Retention as open space is inconsistent <br /> with General Plan residential <br /> designations. <br /> <br /> Fact: Any other project consistent with <br /> General Plan designations would have <br /> similar effects. <br /> <br />1.B. Si~nificant Effect: Inconsistency with "open space" <br /> and allowable density General Plan provisions. <br /> <br /> 1.b.1. Finding: The revised plan eliminates these <br /> inconsistencies. <br /> <br /> Fact: No development and/or lot lies above 670 <br /> ft. elevation. <br /> <br /> Fact: At 23 units, the revised plan is well <br /> below maximum General Plan density. <br /> <br /> ~/~.1/s9 '1- <br /> EXHIBIT <br /> <br /> <br />