Laserfiche WebLink
5.b.2. Finding: The "No Project" alternative is <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> Fact: See 1.a.2. <br /> <br />5.C. Siunificant Effect: Erosion potential is high due to <br /> grading and construction operations. <br /> <br /> 5.c.1. Findinq: The revised plan substantially <br /> lessens this effect. <br /> <br /> Fact: Extensive erosion control is included in <br /> the development plan, including <br /> hydroseeding and silt fences around mass <br /> graded areas~ erosion control measures <br /> must meet City standard specifications <br /> and will be periodically inspected <br /> during construction. <br /> <br /> Fact: All major grading will occur at once, <br /> with developer-installed erosion control <br /> measures following, to minimize improper <br /> erosion control and/or failure to <br /> maintain erosion control devices over <br /> time. <br /> <br /> Fact: The revised plan eliminates the area of <br /> major grading on the upper south knoll. <br /> <br /> Fact: Storm water runoff would be controlled <br /> through surface drainage measures to <br /> reduce sheet flow over graded cut/fill <br /> areas and to discharge flows to natural <br /> drainage courses in appropriately <br /> designed, energy dissipating means. <br /> <br /> 5.c.2. Findina: The "No Project" alternative is <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> Fact: See 1.a.2. <br /> <br />6. Public Facilities and ServiCeS <br /> <br />6.A. Si~nificant EffeCt: The project is a potential fire <br /> risk due to its location and design. <br /> <br /> 6.a.1. Findina: The revised project substantially <br /> lessens this effect. <br /> <br /> Fact: The longest steep road has been <br /> deleted. <br /> <br /> Fact: Street grades are predominantly 15% or <br /> less. <br /> <br />2/21/89 -9- <br /> <br /> <br />