PC 2001-35 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-01-35 Page 5 applicant shall install with the office building expansion signs designating the subject parking spaces. Said signage shall state "Parking for Electrical Vehicles Only, Contact Building Owner for More Information". These changes shall be shown on the building permit set submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director before issuance of a building permit. 15. The project developer shall install a bench(s) and ashtray/waste receptacle in a designated smoking area at a distance of no less than 20 ft. from the building entrance. This change shall be shown on the building permit plan set submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. The design of the bike racks shall be shown on the building permit plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to occupancy of the building expansion, the property owner or its successors shall submit to the Planning Director and the City's TSM Coordinator for review and approval a project specific Transportation Systems Management (TSM) plan which identifies measures needed to obtain the objective of less than 28 vehicle trips to or from the project site during the AM peak hour and less than 28 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. The City staff shall conduct annual traffic counts at the site to determine whether or not the above-mentioned objectives are being achieved. Should the annual counts show that the above-mentioned objectives are not being meet, the property owners, within three (3) months of written notification by the City, shall submit a revised TSM plan to the Planning Director and the City TSM Coordinator for review and approval which clearly identifies the additional measures that will be implemented to meet the objectives. 18. Prior to occupancy of the office building expansion, the property owner or its successors in interest (owner) shall enter into an agreement with the City of Pleasanton (City) to provide that: the owner shall either not protest the establishment of an assessment district, or shall affirmatively vote for the creation of the district or other mechanism to pay the construction costs for the 1-680/West Las Positas Boulevard freeway interchange, or alternative traffic mitigation improvement(s) selected by the City Council, depending on the manner of creation of the funding mechanism; the owner retains the right to protest that the allocation of costs among various properties is inequitable under the above-mentioned funding mechanisms; and, in the event the assessment mechanism appears to impose economically infeasible levels of costs upon the site, the City agrees to explore alternative financing methods.