My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2001-10
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 2001-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:40 AM
Creation date
3/8/2002 9:41:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/14/2001
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2001-10
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-88-16-2M
NOTES
8031 BETHEL LN
NOTES 3
RICHARD & TRACY LU
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2001-10 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECONSIDERING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION <br />REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD AND TRACY LU FOR A MAJOR <br />MODIFICATION TO A PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS FILED UNDER CASE <br />PUD~88-16-2M <br /> <br />at its meeting of January 24, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of Case PUD-88-16-2M, the application of Richard and Tmcy Lu for a <br />major modification to PUD-88-16 to allow the retention of a solid privacy fence <br />along a portion of the rear property line of an existing residence located at 8031 <br />Bethel Lane; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at the February 14, 2001, the Planning Commission agreed to reconsider this matter; <br /> and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its duly noticed public hearing of March 14, 2001, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR (Low Density <br /> Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the applicant and neighbor shall be <br /> given 30 days to reach a compromise regarding the fence. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.