Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2381 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF <br />THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) PREPARED FOR <br />CASE PUD -81 -30 (HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK) <br />WHEREAS, in May 1982, the Planning Commission recommended approval <br />of the development plan and planned unit development zoning <br />for the Hacienda Business Park and in June of that year, <br />the City Council took action approving the project. Subsequently, <br />the PUD and accompanying EIR were challenged in court by <br />Citizens for Balanced Growth (CBG), a small group of valley <br />residents opposed to the development. All of the CBG's <br />challenges to the EIR were dismissed by the judge but he <br />concurred with their contention that approval of the PUD <br />itself was inconsistent with the Pleasanton's General Plan <br />because of a goal in the Growth Management Element which <br />calls for a balance among land uses within the City. He <br />felt that approval of the Hacienda Business Park created <br />the potential for generating more jobs within the City <br />than there would be housing to accommodate those workers; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, approval (Ordinance No. 1040) was set aside by the judge <br />"...unless or until amendment is made to either Hacienda <br />Business Park or to the General Plan such that Hacienda <br />is consistent with the General Plan;" and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council decided to take the latter tack and initiated <br />an amendment to the Growth Management Element of the General <br />Plan to clarify that the projected employment from the <br />Hacienda Business Park and 21 other commercial and industrial <br />projects approved in the City through May 1983 are consistent <br />with maintaining a balance among land uses within the City; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of October 26, 1983, <br />the Planning Commission took public testimony, reviewed <br />relevant documents and considered the recommendations of <br />the City staff; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information <br />contained in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report <br />(EIR) in conformance with the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) prepared for the proposed reapproval <br />of Hacienda Business Park filed under case PUD- 81 -30. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />RESOLVES THE FOLLOIWNG: <br />Section 1. Certifies that the Planning Commission has read and <br />reviewed the EIR and find it complete and adequate for <br />the Planned Unit Development of Hacienda Business Park <br />as filed under case PUD- 81 -30. <br />