2380 - Laserfiche WebLink

mandate development of commercial and industrial uses at proposed densities. G. Partial Approval Alternative. g.1 Finding. The Partial Approval Alternative is infeasible. g.2 Fact. The Partial Approval Alternative has similar impacts to the Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative. See Section XII.e.2. H. Mixed Use Alternative. h.1 Findinq. The Mixed Use Alternative is infeasible. h.2 Fact. The Project is located near the junction of two freeways. Noise, air and traffic impacts from the freeways, major arterials and in -tract collector streets would have a negative impact on the duality of life expected for a residen- tial development. In addition, the Project is located in the middle of an area planned for in- dustrial and commercial development and would be relatively isolated from schools, some types of retail shopping and other community services generally desired to be close to residential developments. Liens resulting from assessments to finance the infrastructure mandate develop- ment of commercial and industrial uses at pro- posed densities. I. Monitoring of Development Alternative. (Final EIR Comment K). i.1 Finding. A suggested mitigation, phase de- velopment in City by monitoring development and resricting growth to two million square feet every five years, is unnecessary as environ- mental impacts will be mitigated. i.2 Fact. The recommended mitigation is unnecessary because (1) environmental impacts of development are mitigated by mitigation measures and condi- tions of approval as described in Sections I through X of this Resolution and (2) City poli- cies allow for control of development on a building -by- building basis with respect to traffic, air and public services impacts. 23.