Laserfiche WebLink
warehouse area. Therefore, the site is unlikely <br />to have noisy warehouse use. <br />b.3 Fact. City Noise Ordinance establishes limits <br />to noise beyond the property plane of an indus- <br />trial area. <br />C. Significant Effect. Increased noise levels at resi- <br />dences along portions of I -680, I -580, Santa Rita <br />Road, Stoneridge Drive, W. Las Positas Blvd., and <br />Hopyard Road. <br />c.1 Finding. Mitigation measures to achieve accept- <br />able residential noise levels incorporated into <br />the Project will substantially lessen the <br />effect. <br />c.2 Fact. Condition No. 5 requires Developer to <br />analyze noise levels at certain specific areas <br />of the Project and mitigate to City Standards. <br />c.3 Fact. Other areas near improvements planned as <br />traffic mitigation measures but funded through <br />NPID are planned to have noise mitigation <br />measures undertaken as part of the improve- <br />ments. Improvements will be in place prior to <br />significant increase in traffic and noise due to <br />Project. <br />D. Significant Effect. Generation of nuisance truck <br />noise. <br />d.1 Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated <br />into the Project to reduce generation of truck <br />noise will avoid this effect. <br />d.2 Fact. Condition 105 requires Developer to relo- <br />cate trucks to routes within the site and onto <br />Hopyard Road northerly of all residences. <br />d.3 Finding. Alternative mitigation measures, i.e., <br />relocation of truck generating uses, are un- <br />necessary as mitigation measures incorporated in <br />the Project cause the effect to be avoided. <br />d.4 Fact. See Section V.d.2 (Noise Mitigation). <br />13. <br />