2369 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2369 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO CASE PUD- 81- 22 -1M, APPLICATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, The City of Pleasanton has applied to amend the provisions of Ordinance 1014 relating to traffic levels of service (LOS) and off -site traffic improvements for case PUD -81 -22 (Stoneridge Busienss Center); and WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of October 12, 1983 the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant documents and recommendations of the City staff; and WHEREAS, a modification of this type is considered to be categorically exempt under CEQA. For this reason, no environmental document accompanies this case; and WHEREAS, Condition No. 56 of Ordinance 1014, approving the planned unit development for the former Daon Project, a mixed commercial /office high density residential development proposed for the 91 acre site located on the north side of Stoneridge Drive between Stoneridge Mall Road and I -680, limits development on the subject property if certain intersections impacted by the proposed project reach traffic level of service (LOS) D. Similar conditions have been attached to the Hacienda and Reynolds and Brown Business Parks, but they limited development if certain intersections reach level of service E; and WHEREAS, at the urging of the owners of the subject property, the City Council initiated a modification to Condition No. 56 of Ordinance 1014 to change the traffic standard from LOS C to LOS D so that the subject property would be on an equal footing with Hacienda and Reynolds and Brown; and WHEREAS, this is considered to be a substantial modification to PUD -81 -22 and, hence is being submitted to the Planning Commission at public hearing for recommendation to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. Recommends that Condition No.56 of Ordinance 1014 be amended to read as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part of this case by reference.