2313 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2313 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LEISURE SPORTS, INC. /VORELCO, INC. UNDER CASE GP -83 -2 WHEREAS, Vorelco, Inc. and Leisure Sports, Inc. have applied to amend the general plan land use designations from General and Limited Industrial to Industrial /Commercial and Offices for approximately 23 acres located at the southeast corner of I -580 and I -680 in the vicinity of 7090 Johnson Drive; and WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of June 8, 1983, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a mitigated negative declaration for this proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at this same duly noticed public hearing considered all public testimony, recommendations of City staff and relevant documents concerning this application. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. Recommends approval of changing the land use designation of the 23 acres located at the southeast corner of I -580 and I -680 in the vicinity of 7090 Johnson Drive from General and Limited Industrial to Industrial /Commercial and Offices subject to the following conditions: 1. That the developer enter into an agreement with the City to enter into an assessment district or districts for the construction of all of the facilities necessary for the amelioration of traffic congestion caused by development of the subject property. These facilities may be those discussed in the North Pleasanton Traffic Studies, Volumes I and II, the Traffic Impact Analysis Stoneridge Center April 15, 1981, or other facilities deemed necessary by issuance of any building permit on the 23 acre subject property. 2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall fund (or participate in the funding of) a comprehensive water study of the north Pleasanton area to identify short and long -term improvements necessary to achieve adequate water supply and pressure. In order to achieve timely completion of such improvements concurrent with the development of the subject site, the developer shall enter into an agreement to pay his appropriate share of the cost of the water facilities necessary to serve the subject property or made necessary due to the cumulative development of the north Pleasanton area. Improvements may be made via reimbursement agreements, assessment districts or benefit districts as best meets the needs of the City and developer. The method of implementation shall be decided and entered into when determined necessary by the City Engineer and /or the City Attorney.