Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing <br />13. : PAP-134, Chris Studzinski (PCUP-237, Rimma Radayeva) – Consideration <br />of an appeal of a Planning Commission decision modifying a previously approved Conditional <br />Use Permit for Radayeva Music Studio located at 1228 Quarry Lane, Suite A, to increase the <br />number of instrument and vocal instructors from one to five at any one time and to extend the <br />hours of operation from 10:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m.-9:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Brian Dolan said a use permit was granted in 2006 for a music <br />studio. It authorized one instructor to provide one-on-one lessons, usually 60 minutes in length. The <br />request was made to expand the operation to include up to 5 instructors and also to extend the <br />hours by approximately 30 minutes. The request was approved by the Planning Commission in <br />February and it was appealed by Mr. Studzinski who owns and operates a specialized machine <br />shop located across from the parking lot. He presented the location of the facility, subject building <br />and 1500 square foot suite, there are 57 total spaces, 35 parking spaces of which are available to <br />the suites, and said the operation has grown beyond its authorized use permit which was brought <br />by staff’s attention through a new instructor who was hired and obtained a business license. Mr. <br />Dolan presented a site plan of the suite, showing five rooms, a waiting room, hallway and bathroom. <br />There are 4 parking spaces in front of the suite, with 1 space dedicated to handicapped parking, as <br />well as close on-street parking which he visually presented. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan presented pictures of the relationship of the subject site (1228) to the appellant’s building. <br />He is located to the north across the parking lot with a driveway that separates the two, with the <br />property line going down the middle. Mr. Studzinski has 19 spaces across the parking lot on his <br />property that serves his machine shop business and other suites in the front end of the building <br />which are currently vacant. <br /> <br />The primary concerns of the appellant are that he has had experience with customers of the music <br />studio parking in his 19 spaces and he would prefer they not do this. He does not necessarily need <br />them all now and he would like to have his parking available for his tenants. He is also opposed in <br />general to the evolution of non-industrial uses in business parks, which include concerns with his <br />ability to rent his space when there are non-industrial users in the area. He has identified safety <br />issues, noting that children attend this use and other uses, there are various trucks coming in and <br />out not necessarily looking for children and he does not believe the mixing of the two uses is right or <br />safe. He provided an example where a family dropped their child off for a lesson and instead of <br />leaving, they decided to stay in the parking lot. The kids were out in the lot and throwing rocks <br />which he feels should not be tolerated. <br /> <br />Staff evaluated the issues, conducted several parking surveys in advance of the Planning <br />Commission hearing and several more since, and has confirmed that even on the side that does not <br />include Mr. Studzinski’s property, there has been ample availability for parking to serve the use, and <br />the business is operating for what they want approval for right now. Staff also suggested modifying <br />the conditions of approval by the Planning Commission to limit the number of instructors at a certain <br />part of the day. Most parking spaces are used up until 4:30 p.m. and if total numbers of instructors <br />are limited to 3 until 4:30 p.m., staff believes this would further eliminate any parking problems. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thorne questioned if staff looked at staggering the start times rather than limiting <br />the number of instructors. Mr. Dolan said the operation does have a very staggered schedule and <br />staff did not regulate this; however, this could be reviewed with the applicant. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan said regarding non-industrial uses in the business park, he said this occurs throughout <br />the City and in other communities. The original approval anticipated there would be mixed uses. It <br />has a wide range of allowed uses that would go well beyond the traditional light industrial definition <br />and anticipated uses similar to this studio given the need for a use permit. Also, in reading the <br /> <br />City Council Minutes Page 9 of 20 April 21, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />