My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN050509
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CCMIN050509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2009 12:33:08 PM
Creation date
6/4/2009 11:30:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Aimee Ann Vickers opposed the conversion, said she cannot buy her space, and was unsure of <br />costs. Those in the Park are aging and after 10 years, they would be unable to obtain a loan. Her <br />children do not want to inherit her unit, the park has many problems that have never been <br />addressed, residents will be stuck with the problems, and homeowner dues will be excessive. <br /> <br />Art Moniz said he wants to address hidden costs and what conversion truly is—buying air space <br />below mobile units. The park is a senior park for those older than 55+, the average age of people is <br />mid 70’s, many low income residents will not be able to get loans, and older units now sell for <br />$70,000 to $90,000. If the land were priced at $100,000, the land and the older units will sell at <br />$170,000 to $190,000, which is more than what fixed income seniors can afford. The park was <br />constructed in 1972 and he moved in January 2005. In 2007, the park sewer line backed up into <br />their unit. The manager sent out a plumber who put a snake 75 feet out into the street into a <br />neighbor’s driveway and found a 1 inch crack in the sewer line. If not fixed and the conversion is <br />passed, the cost of jack hammering of the driveway and replacing or fixing the sewer line would be <br />paid by the homeowners association. The sewer line backed up two other times in January 2008 <br />and April 2008. The half inch crack still exists. This New Year’s, residents had a party at the <br />clubhouse and the women’s toilet backed up. It took 4 days for Valley Plumbing to clear the line. <br />This St. Patrick’s Day, they held a dinner in the clubhouse. The kitchen sink plugged up and the <br />plumber was called. He said a pond is located next to the clubhouse whose liner is deteriorating <br />which needs repair. He also noted a transformer in the summertime trips outside the clubhouse. <br />The outage occurs in either half or the entire park due to the numbers of air conditioners running. <br />During March, the transformer went out for 5.5 hours during a rain storm and the park was without <br />electricity. As of this April, electrical work was being done to replace the underground electrical <br />cables. The contractor dug holes in the street and pulled cables through. The state inspector came <br />out and stopped the contractor’s work because he needed a permit for electrical work, and the <br />contractor was told to install conduit so that the new electrical cable would go through. Therefore, <br />all repair work was stopped. He presented the park manager’s disclosure form dated 1/20/09 that <br />states the electrical utility systems and septic sewer systems, have no substantial defects, which he <br />thinks is untrue. <br /> <br />th <br />Mr. Moniz then referred to the January 7 Council report, page 3 of 6, Market Rents, #2, “Loss of <br />Affordable Rental Housing” and read it into the record: “Rent increases for lower income <br />households will be tied generally to cost of living increases, but rents for households that are not <br />lower income will rise to the market value as determined by the park owner, phased in over a 5 year <br />period.” <br /> <br />Mr. Moniz said realtors buy older units, haul them out and bring in new manufactured homes in the <br />park and install them onto lots that are not big enough for them. Property line markers have been <br />moved to accommodate the new, larger homes and this is done by the installer and with the park <br />manager present. He said the park owner has attorneys representing them, but residents only have <br />the Council representing them, and he asked the Council to vote no on the conversion. <br /> <br />Pam O’Connell said she was representing her father who lives in the park, said she has attended <br />meetings held, said the survey sent out was legally written, hard to understand, and after reading it <br />over they believed they should vote “no opinion”, hoping more information would be provided. <br />However, she said the owner is counting the “no opinion” vote as a “yes” vote. If residents who <br />voted this way were polled, they would indicate they don’t have enough information. She felt the <br />first meeting was coercive; residents were asked to sign an agreement to support the conversion in <br />exchange for a 15% discount for the lot and she was surprised the representatives operated in this <br />way with seniors. Her father does not have the money to purchase his lot and he will choose to rent; <br /> <br />City Council Minutes Page 9 of 17 May 5, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.