My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN050509
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CCMIN050509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2009 12:33:08 PM
Creation date
6/4/2009 11:30:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the survey, and asked the Council to recognize the benefits to the community and residents and <br />approve the subdivision. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio said she spent a lot of time reading the materials, said the survey was done <br />14 months ago and in different economic times. She thought many of the responses should not be <br />construed as non-supportive or supportive and she thinks the survey is silent on many things that <br />she would like to have answered. Also, it is clear from the staff report, emails, letters, and public <br />comment that if this is beneficial, residents do not understand that it is. For this reason, regardless <br />of what the Government Code states, she felt there has been a failure in conveying information <br />necessary to convince the residents that this is a benefit. It is also not clear what would happen to <br />those who are in a certain income “gap” and what would happen to them, particularly with the term <br />“market value” rent. She asked to have more information , believed the property owner has a right <br />to do with what he wants with the property but questioned what would happen to those people who <br />own their structure if they choose not to buy the land. <br /> <br />Additionally, Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio said State law only mandates that a survey be done and is <br />ambiguous about the results of the survey. She read the Government Code Section that says, <br />“Obtain a survey of support of the mobile home park for the proposed conversion.” As a teacher, if <br />she wanted more specificity, she would have said, “obtain a survey of support or non-support…” or <br />that it requires that one supports the proposed conversion. She would like to see a survey done in <br />the current economic times and more information provided as to the benefits for residents. She also <br />asked what responsibility there was to those currently in the park and what alternative does the low <br />income resident who chooses not to purchase. How does the conversion affect the value of the <br />structure, and would market rate rent make it difficult or impossible to sell the unit? Also, she <br />questioned whether someone could buy the land but not the structure. She said the homes are also <br />not truly mobile homes which can be moved to another park. If rents go up and the resident cannot <br />afford it but cannot sell the structure because the value is not there, and they cannot get a loan to <br />buy the land, what happens to that person. She also questioned why the State oversees mobile <br />home parks and not local government. <br /> <br />Mr. Roush said there was a concern expressed by the mobile home park owners that different <br />jurisdictions would impose different regulations on them and as a result, the State legislature <br />decided it would have uniform regulations that would apply to mobile homes throughout the State. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio questioned if age was a deterrent to answering the survey and questioned <br />whether some community outreach would be helpful in terms of the number of surveys returned. <br />Finally, she said if you sell a house, defects must be addressed, but if people do not understand the <br />set of rules and if the State oversees it, does it require the property owner to bring the infrastructure <br />up to standard prior to any units being sold. She also would like to see a bona fide survey done and <br />have her questions answered because it does not appear that time is of the essence. She would <br />then feel more comfortable making a decision which would also be of benefit to the owner and <br />residents. She said she contacted some legislators about the issue, which is vague. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thorne said he would want to take it a step further and raise a red flag which is the <br />State legislature does not have a concern about protecting local public decision makers’ ability to <br />make local decisions on land use. He said over the years, ABAG has been delegated the <br />responsibility by the State to determine how many houses and income levels communities must <br />build, which was the first step to take away local control. He felt it makes sense to have a regional <br />organization that takes care of transportation dollars but when you combine that and fold it in with <br />other regional controls, it becomes onerous. He said ABAG will be able to determine what local <br /> <br />City Council Minutes Page 11 of 17 May 5, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.