My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 65014
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1960-1969
>
1965
>
RES 65014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2002 5:04:56 PM
Creation date
12/21/2001 7:59:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/25/1965
DOCUMENT NO
RES 65014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br /> STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> ~l~l~ LNTI~ N ND. ~"~"-,/f <br />OPPOSING PLEASANTON RIDGE AND SUNOL AREA ANNEXATION <br />AZZEM BY VA ,LE¥ CO NIT SERVICE D STR ¢T <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, The Valley Community Service District, a public <br />agency providing certain services in the northern portion of <br />Pleasanton Township, has filed a proposal for annexation, in- <br />cluding the Foothill area west of State Highway No. 21 and the <br />Sunol area, estimated at over 12,000 acres; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is of the magnitude that <br />orderly and responsible expansion of government services is <br />impossible without conflicting with other jurisdictions; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> 1. The City Council does hereby vigorously, positively <br />and strongly oppose the proposed annexation of Valley Corm~unity <br />Service District in the area to the west and south of the City <br />of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> 2. A partial list of the reasons for this opposition is <br />as follows: <br /> <br /> a) The proposal overlaps Pleasanton Annexation No. <br />presently before the District Court of Appeals, after having <br />been upheld in the trial court. <br /> <br />24-t <br /> <br /> b) The area is largely unpopulated, and no serious or <br />realistic development has been commenced. <br /> <br /> c) <br />district to <br />applicant's <br /> <br /> It is legally impossible for a community service <br />annex to provide one service only, as represented by <br />leaders. <br /> <br /> d) Much of the area lies within the Pleasanton Townshi <br />County Water District, and is served with water by the District <br />and the City of Pleasanton under a joint powers agreement. <br /> <br /> 3. The city officers are hereby authorized to appear <br />before the Local Agency Formation Commission to fully present the <br />opposition of the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> DATED: January 25, 1965.~ ~ <br /> <br /> ~oIIN' B. LONG, Mayor <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />HELEN'WOODWARD, City Clerk <br /> <br /> I hereb, y certify the foregoing is a true and co{rec~t <br />copy of Resolutzon No. 65-14, adopted by the City Councii os <br />the City of Pleasanton on January 25, 1965, the original of whick <br />is on file in my office. <br /> <br /> HELEN WOODWARD <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.