My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1565
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1501 - 1600
>
ORD 1565
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 11:49:34 AM
Creation date
3/10/1999 7:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1565
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 4 <br /> FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />The EIR prepared for the project considered five alternatives to <br />the project as follows. The reasons each alternative is found <br />feasible or infeasible follows the description of the alternative, <br /> <br />No-Project Alternative <br /> <br />This alternative would not approved the subject proposal, leaving <br />the project site in its current state. This alternative would. <br />delay development of the site' and maintain current passive open <br />space uses. <br /> <br />The FEIR indicates on page'11-2 that with the No-Project <br />Alternative, all development-related impacts of the project would <br />be avoided. <br /> <br />Findings Infeasible : <br /> <br />The City finds that the No-Project Alternative is infeasible and <br />less desirable than the project, and rejects the No-Project <br />Alternative, for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> · Mitigation measures incorporated into the project, or <br /> conditions of approval which will be imposed on the <br /> specific approvals for development of the project site, <br /> have substantially mitigated, or will substantially <br /> mitigate, all of the environmental effects of the <br /> project, thereby diminishing or obviating the perceived <br /> mitigating benefits of adopting the No-Project <br /> AlternatiVe; <br /> <br /> · Specifically, the project incorporates the dedication of <br /> a larger percentage of the site in various open space <br /> uses. Implementation of this alternative is not <br /> necessary in order to mitigate to an insignificant level <br /> the various effects o[ the project; <br /> <br /> · Preservation of open space is not an explicit General <br /> Plan objective for the project site, as the project site <br /> is currently designated for industrial use; and <br /> <br /> · The No-Project Alternative would eliminate a potential <br /> source of funding for schools facilities and .park <br /> improvements to help serve the wider community and Sunol <br /> Avenue widening along the project frontage to improve <br /> traffic conditions on this City arterial. <br /> <br /> 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.