PC 09/08/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Swift referenced a staff report dated September 8, 1999, and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, and site development standards. Further, he referenced a memorandum dated September 7, 1999, and noted that this memorandum contains modifications to the conditions that would bring conditions more in compliance with the final version of the Specific Plan, as it was approved by the City Council. Further, he noted that all reports have been provided to the Commission. In conclusion, he noted that staffs recommendation is to find that the proposed PUD development plans are consistent with the General Plan, purposes of the PUD ordinance, and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; to make the PUD findings as listed in this staff report; and, adopt a resolution recommending approval of Cases PUD-99-6, PUD-99-8, PUD-99-9, PUD-99-10 and PUD-99-12 to the City Council, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B" and modifications to conditions as contained in the September 7, 1999 memorandum. Discussion ensued relating to the sound berm being extended on Clara Lane to address noise issues. Commissioner Sullivan requested clarification from staff on the removal of trees and replacement of existing trees with 24-inch box trees and soil testing being performed prior to the park being developed. Commission Maas requested clarification from staff relating to the type of fencing to be utilized, the landscaping for the soundwall, and the homeowners' association being responsible for maintenance of the landscaping along the berm. Commissioner Kameny requested clarification from staff relating to whether the applicant's proposal meets the required conditions and modifications of the Vineyard Avenue Specific Plan. Chairperson Roberts requested clarification from staff relating to conditions contained in the Specific Plan; issues relating to the size of open space areas for agricultural and animal use; exit from the Gooch property and whether a stop sign will be installed at this site; flat pad grading; sound berm location; whether these properties are utilizing wells; and whether easements are owned by property owners. Commissioner Sullivan requested clarification from stuff whether the neighborhood traffic study was conducted for the four-lane section of Vineyard Avenue and the timeline for the vesting of the property prior to the November 2, 1999 election. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Phil Rowe, applicant, 1544 Arbutos Drive, Walnut Creek, noted he would be willing to answer any questions the Commission may have and has nothing additional to add to staffs presentation. Mr. Rowe requested that the Commission act on this project tonight and forward this project to the City Council. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas, the applicant noted he is flexible with the plans for the design of the houses. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts of the hypothetical scenario of one of the PUD's not being approved, he noted that the projects complement one another and were designed as a whole project. Further, that issues such as grading are intertwined. Frank Jardin, 751 Clara Lane, noted that his property was not included on the conditions for the height of the houses. Chairperson Roberts noted that single-story homes, such as Mr. Jardin's, have a height restriction of 23 feet. Further, Mr. Jardin noted he would not be in support of a parking lane or sidewalk adjacent to his house. Mr. Higdon noted that it is a City standard for a public street to allow parking on one side to allow for an emergency area for vehicles or as a bicycle lane. Mr. Swift noted there are no plans for a sidewalk, that the street stops before Mr. Jardin's property, and that street will only be continued when other parcels are subdivided. Further, Mr. Jardin expressed concern with adjacent PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 September 8, 1999