My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/07/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 07/07/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:06:40 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/7/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/07/99
NOTES
BERNAL PROP PUBLIC HEARING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Residential Product Type Mix (continued) <br /> <br />Maas: <br /> <br />Referenced "Plan B," noting that she likes this mix with the addition of some <br />larger lots. Would like to see the medium lots shared with large lots (15% <br />large/35% medium). <br /> <br />Maximum Pro|ect-Specific Density <br /> <br />Kumaran: Prefers the two-story product and reduce to 22 DU/acm. <br />Roberts: likes the flexibility of 32 DU/acres; three-story buildings are o.k. depending on <br /> the architecture <br />Maas/Sullivan/ <br />Kameny: agreed with Commissioner Roberts' comments <br /> <br />Affordable Housing <br /> <br />Kameny: comfortable with 300 units being affordable if 1900 units; at least 10% <br /> below-market-rates; would like more apartments <br />Maas/Roberts/ <br />Sullivan: agreed with Commissioner Kameny's comments, indicating that the units should <br /> be spread throughout the development <br />Kumaran: suggested using funds to purchase existing apartments for affordable housing <br /> <br />Residential Design <br /> <br />Roberts: <br /> <br />Sullivan: <br />Maas: <br />Kameny: <br /> <br />agrees that the townhouse/duet designs at a higher density achieves a more <br />desirable neo-traditional neighborhood design; does not like the "alley" projects <br />would to strengthen the language and have stronger guidelines <br />likes staff recommendation <br />noted that there are some good projects using the "alley" concept <br /> <br />Growth Management <br /> <br />Roberts: <br />Sullivan: <br /> <br />the timeframe/numbers need to be updated; prefers alternative #2; address later <br />under "Development Agreement" <br />likes alternatives #2 and #3 <br /> <br />Commercial/Office Development <br /> <br />Sullivan: <br /> <br />Robe,s: <br /> <br />concern regarding the commercial/office in the Village Center looking like <br />Koll/Hacienda Business Park; wants the design to be different; needs language in <br />Specific Plan stating what the Commission wants; supports three- or four-stories <br />and reduction in square footage <br />need strong design elements for taller buildings <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 July 7, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.