My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/07/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 07/07/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:06:40 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/7/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/07/99
NOTES
BERNAL PROP PUBLIC HEARING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
discretion to come up with a satisfactory Village Center development plan <br />including residential uses, and San Francisco can determine at that time <br />whether Pleasanton's requirements will enable a viable project to proceed <br />before committing to Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Residential Development Potential <br /> <br />Issue: <br /> <br />Overall project may be too intense, parcel-based allowed density ranges are <br />too broad, and area limits are too high. <br /> <br />Proposed Project: The Specific Plan establishes an overall limit of 1900 units, <br /> establishes broad parcel-based allowable ranges of density, and limits the <br /> Western, Central, and Eastern areas to no more than 640, 923, and 374 units, <br /> respectively. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />Reduce to total cap x units (1600, other #). <br />Reduce the total cap, unless additional specified housing is added (e.g., <br />additional lower-income housing, moderate-income for-sale housing, <br />housing within the Village Center, etc.) <br />Narrow individual parcel allowable ranges to better designate what <br />product type will be built within the project (e.g., change Parcel 5 to 26-32 <br />DU/acre to ensure concentration of apartments/multi-family is built on the <br />Village Residential site; change Parcel 20 to 3-6 DU/acre to ensure <br />primarily single-family detached product around Western area golf course, <br />etc.) <br />Adopt specific plan text language describing the character (type/densities) <br />to be built within each area, to which subsequent residential permit plans <br />would have to conform. <br />Modify the area limits to match intended results (e.g., increase the Central <br />Area limit to allow higher concentrations of multi-family uses in Village <br />Center, Village Residential, and other Central Area parcels; reduce the <br />Western Area to better blend with "west of 1-680" lower densities; etc. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The overall limit of 1900 units was negotiated as a trade-offbetween an <br />overall density/product type consistent with Pleasanton's neighborhoods <br />and project amenities. At 1900 units, the project is more dense overall <br />(9.5 units per residential acre) than most major Pleasanton neighborhoods; <br />at 1600 units, it is similar to those at the upper end of Pleasanton <br />neighborhood densities (8 units/acre). Incorporating units in the Village <br />Center and concentrating density within the Village Residential parcel will <br />diminish the perception of density throughout the balance of the plan. <br />Adding scattered, small-scale multi-family product types would further <br />help this. The Eastern Area will have about 10 DU/acre (at 374 total <br />units), about half the density of the Case Avenue existing apartments but <br /> <br />Substantive Issues/Alternatives Page 3 June 9, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.