My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/07/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 07/07/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:06:40 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/7/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/07/99
NOTES
BERNAL PROP PUBLIC HEARING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
26. Subsequent Approvals <br /> <br />Roberts: <br />Sullivan: <br /> <br />Kameny: <br />K~umaran: <br />Maas: <br /> <br />o.k. not to make subject to later referendum <br />disagreed with Commissioner Roberts, noting that this would cut-out a major part <br />of the democratic process <br />o.k. to eliminate referendum if the entire project is approved up front <br />should allow referendum; will not be referended if it is a good project <br />supports staff recommendation; agreed with Commissioner Roberts and Kameny <br /> <br />27. Limitation on New Requirements/Normal City Police Power <br /> <br />Kameny: <br /> <br />Maas: <br />Sullivan: <br /> <br />Robe,s: <br /> <br />concurs with staff, likes alternatives under bullet number 2 and 3; perhaps based <br />on the number of units; also review growth management agreement <br />likes alternative under bullet number 2; suggested every three years <br />would like another option with a more normal process that PUD approvals follow <br />after the Specific Plan is approved, with no Development Agreement; some of the <br />other options may work <br />an updated analysis (for traffic, water, etc.) should be done with each project <br /> <br />There was considerable discussion by the Commission relating to an appropriate date to hold a special <br />meeting relating to the San Francisco Water Department Bernal Property. Chairperson Kumaran <br />requested that staff poll commission members for dates for a meeting and suggested July 12, July 13, or <br />July 16, 1999, as possible meeting dates. <br /> <br />4, MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas stated that the Peoplesoft entrance sign is too small in comparison to building. She <br />inquired as to what the Commission approved and requested that staffprovide comments to the <br />administrator. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts requested that an item be agendized for discussion at a future meeting relating to <br />removal of the monthly cap on Commission meetings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny inquired as to the status of the Russ Morgan property. Mr. Swift noted that the <br />City Attorney is drawing up injunction papers. <br /> <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />The Planning Commission Meeting was adjourned at 12:15 a.m. by Chairperson Kumaran. <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br /> BRIAN SWIFT, <br />- Secretary <br /> <br />PLANNiNG COMMISSION MiNUTES Page 10 July 7, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.