PC 121300 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. ]~EVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO TILE. AGENDA Itean 6.d., Review of the 2000 C~rowth Management Report, is continued to the January 10 meeting. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION 1~1. Ddeo Bmllder~ Aptdication for PUD Development Plan approval to allow: (I) the construction of 38 ~Ingle-farnily detached homes; (2) the eonslxuction of a public sewer "lif[" station; (3) the realignment of Vineyard Avenue to a location adjoining the Arroyo Del Valle; (4) the establishment of one vineyard/estate site; (5) the designation of a portion of the existing Vineyard Avenue alignment as a public trail; and (6) the construction of miscellaneous public infrastructure including streets, utilities, etc. The overall project site is comprised of two properties located at 2503 Vineyard Avenue which is zoned PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential) and 2287 Vineyard Avenue, which is zoned PUD-Vineyard/OS/IV[DR (Planned Unit Development -Vineyard/Open Space/Medium Density Residential). The Planning Commission will also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the property located at 2503 Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Pavan presented the staff report, noting that the Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its October 11 meeting. He advised that the proposal before the Commission this evening is essentially the same as the project previously presented, noting that changes to the project include modifications to the realignment of Vineyard Avenue, preservation of several more oak trees on the site, and e~hancements to the architecture for Plan 3. Mr. Pavan noted that comments from Mr. Brozosky which were received al[er publication of the staff report are included in staff's memo, as well as the responses tO those comments. He advised that issues addressed in the December 13 staff report relate to the noise impacts from the Lonestar gravel plant, amenities for the Costus portion of the proposal, building design, vineyard planting, construetion schedule, disclosures, and lot siting. Mr. Pavan advised that initially staff's recommendation was that the vineyard planting plan and integrat~i pest management plan for the Hahner property (parcel "A") be provided to the Planning Commission for review and action with the tentative map application. He noted that this has been changed to defer the submittal of these items to a site-specific PUD Development Plan for parcel "A." He advised that a preliminary proposal for the vineyard planting was received and is included in the materials provided this evening. Mr. Pavan stated that a condition of approval requires that the vineyard needs to be planted prior to the issuance of building permits to Delco for the remaining 25% of the proposed lots on the Hahuer property. Mr. Pavan reported that a model easement by the South Livermore Agricultural Trust was provided to the Planning Commission. Mr. Arkin questioned the language for the conservation eesement. Mr. Pavan advised that the model would be reviewed by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation of the final map. Commissi0ner Arkin noted that it is still unclear to him as to what controls the City would have to assure that the vineyards would be maintained appropriately in perpetuity. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2000 Page 2