Laserfiche WebLink
~ 4. I~VISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />P~I. Delco Builders <br />Application for PUD Development Plan approval to allow: (1) the construction of 38 <br />single-family detached homes; (2) the constmedon of a public sewer "lift" station; (3) the <br />realignment of Vineyard Avenue to a location adjoining the Arroyo Del Valle; (4) the <br />establishment of one vineyard/estate site; (5) the designation of a portion of the existing <br />Vineyard Avenue alignment as a public trail; and (6) the construction of miscellaneous <br />public infrastructure including streets, utilities, etc. The overall project site is comprised <br />of two properties located at 2503 Vineyard Avenue which is zoned PUD-LDR (Planned <br />Unit Development - Low Density Residential) and 2287 Vineyard Avenue, which is <br />zoned PUD-Vineyard/OS/MDR (Planned Unit Development -Vineyard/Open <br />Space/Medium Density Residential). The Planning Commission will also consider the <br />Negative Declaration prepared for the property located at 2503 Vineyard Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan presented the staff report, providing an overview of the proposal. He noted that the <br />project includes two existing sites: one within the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan and <br />one that is not covered by the Specific Plan. He provided history of the Costas property PUD <br />approval, and information regarding the proposed density and provisions for amenities. He <br />noted that the developer of the Costas property would be required to participate in all of the <br />funding mechanisms specified by the Specific Plan and pay the same per unit development fees. <br />He advised that staff has, therefore, determined, that while specific amenities are not being <br />provided, the property meets the test for amenities by participating in the funding mechanisms, <br />street construction, etc. He commented on the proposed realignment of Vineyard Avenue, noting <br />that staff believes this is an improvement of what was previously shown. Mr. Pavan stated that <br />there is an issue related to the noise impacts of the Lonestar gravel processing plant on the Lots <br />33 through 36 on the Costas property and commented on the mitigation measures and conditions <br />that have been included to address the noise impacts. He advised that that refined architectural <br />design guidelines and landscape design guidelines have been prepared by a consulting <br />architectural firm for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor. <br /> <br />Mar. Pavan reported that he received an e-mail communication from Mr. Steve Brozosky, an <br />adjoining property owner, siting 11 concerns regarding the proposed project. Mr. Pavan advised <br />that as a result of this communication, staff reviewed the conditions of approval, and revised the <br />conditions to bring them closer in conformance with the Specific Plan and address Mr. <br />Brozosky's concerns. He noted that Mr. Brozosky's e-mall and the revised conditions have been <br />distributed to the Planning Commission this evening and provided an overview of the changes. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 11, 2000 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />