PC 091300 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to Commissioner Arkin's inquiry, Mr. Barraza advised that he earmot see the proposed site from his home. Mr. Barraza stated that he would prefer the home to be located off of the street. Jim Butts, 16 Grey Eagle Court, stated that he told Mr. Roberts that they would like the house built in the location that would most protect their privacy and that the knoll location would have the worst effect on them, that the center of the building pad would be less desirable, and the street or north side of the building pad would seem to have the least effect on their house. He noted that he has not seen any drawings of the split-pad houses and eaunot form an opinion on this option. Mr. Butts noted that a 4,000 to 5,000-square-foot house would be acceptable and that he was surprised with the 6,500-square-foot size of the house. He stated that if Mr. Roberts can meet the grading requirements and landscape and provide erosion control seeding for areas of the site that have minimal grading after the home is built, he really could not say very much about the location of the house. Marti Evans, 18 Grey Eagle Court, stated that she would not speak and would defer her time to another speaker.! Mark Fasnacht,, Review Commit He noted that a ~ that he does not i noted that there t problem with thc built on the stree . Red Feather Court, stated that he is a member of the Grey Eagle Arohitecmral ce. He commented that everyone has had access to the plans during the review. otc of 2/3 of the homeowners is needed to change the building pad of a lot and tel that changing the pad for this lot is a reasonable thing to do. He further re no view easements on the property. He noted that he does not have a plan as stated. He advised that he does not support the street location and if : it would have to be a smaller home. Russell Schmidti 18 Grey Eagle Court, noted that he is the closest downslope neighbor and that he is on the Board of Directors of the Homeowners' Association. He stated that any house on Lot 12 _,will hav~some impacts on all of the neighboring houses. He further stated that Mr. Roberts proposal was approved by the Grey Eagle Homeowners' Architectural Review Committee and that he supports the result of that process: the approval ora single-pad house sited within the Center of the building pad. He noted that it may not be the most optimal proposal for him, but that ~t is a result of a compromise of conflicting impacts on neighboring houses. He advised that he iS surprised that the staff report questions the siting of the house, in that he felt that after the approval of the Architectural Review Committee, the City's involvement with the siting would be limited to verifying that the site was wholly within the improved building pad. He noted that the alternative siting areas in the knoll area or further down the hill towards his house will have a totally unacceptable impact on his privacy, the enjoyment of his house, and on the value. He indicated that the proposed house can have acceptable view screening and a split- pad makes acceptable screening impossible. He requested that the Planning Commission bear in mind the issues and potential impacts on his house when making its decision about this development proposal. Melanie Bentleyi 23 Grey Eagle Court, stated that no one has come up with a solution for this property that wo¢ld satisfy everyone surrounding the lot. She noted that her home was planned with the knowledge that houses would be built on all of the parcels around them. She advised PLANNING coMMIsSION MINUTES September 13, 2000 Page 5