PC 062800 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Callahan, speaking for the applicant, noted he would not be in favor of returning with a new PUD due to the costs incurred for this project and the work previously performed on the project. He also indicated that the applicant would be willing to provide a visual analysis of the project for the Planning Commission's review. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Maas suggested continuing this item for two weeks to allow the applicant to provide a visual analysis. Commissioner Sullivan spoke in favor of a new PUD being submitted. Commissioner Malmrose spoke in favor oftbe project being reduced with the house not meeting the setback requirement being a single-story home. A motion was made by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner Arkin, to deny Case PUD-98-1-1M and Tract 7030 and recommend to the City Council that staff be directed to take the necessary steps to revert the six lots to acreage. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arkin and Sullivan NOES: Commissioners Maas and Malmrose and Chairperson Roberts A~SENT: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Kameny The motion failed on a two-to-three vote. Commissioner Mass moved to continue this hearing to allow for provision of a visual analysis and geo~echnical study. Commissioner Arkin requested a new staffreport be provided addressing easement issues and how the project can be conditioned. He further suggested this item be continued as a two-step process at the July 12, 2000 and July 26, 2000 meetings. Commissioner Sullivan requested that staff address issues relating to the whipsnake habitat. A motian was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Chairperson Roberts, that Item No. 6.d. be continued to the July 12, 2000 and July 26, 2000 meetings. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Maas, Malmrose, and Sullivan and Chairperson Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: CommissionerKameny PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 2000 Page 14