Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A <br />Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA AND <br />THE CITY OF PLEASANTON REGARDING TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TAX <br />REVENUES IN CONNECTION WITH <br /> THE STAPLES RANCH PROPERTY - PHASE II ANNEXATION <br /> <br />This Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 <br />and shall constitute the agreement for exchange of property tax revenues required by the <br />Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b)(6). Furthermore, Revenue and Taxation Code section <br />99(b)(5) provides that if a jurisdictional change will alter the service area or service <br />responsibility of a special district, the Board of Supervisors of the county in which the special <br />district is located shall negotiate any exchange of property tax revenues on behalf of the special <br />district. <br /> <br />The parties agree that for annexation of parcels within the area located in the northeastern comer <br />of the City as shown in Exhibit A, pages 3-4, listing all applicable parcel numbers, to this <br />agreement and incorporated herein, the Auditor-Controller of the County of Alameda is directed <br />to cause an exchange of property tax revenue as follows: <br /> <br />The City is entitled to receive an allocation of computed property tax revenue <br />equivalent to the share of property tax revenue it receives on a weighted average <br />citywide. The weighted citywide average shall be computed annually as follows: <br />multiply the city's current AB8 factor in each tax rate area within the city by the <br />current secured assessed valuation in each tax rate area to arrive at a product for each <br />tax rate area. The sum of those products is divided by the total secured assessed <br />valuation within the city to arrive at a weighted citywide average. The secured tax <br />roll is used here to establish the weighted citywide average. However, the factors <br />resulting from application of the formula will apply to all tax rolls. <br /> <br />In the event that the City currently provides a service within its incorporated city <br />limits such as Fire or Library, and if that service is currently being provided by a <br />County taxing agency or special district in the territory proposed for annexation, the <br />County shall receive an allocation of computed property tax revenue equivalent to the <br />share of property tax revenue received by the County taxing agency or special district <br />in the territory proposed for annexation. The County's receipt of that allocation shall <br />not diminish the City's receipt of its allocation calculated under A above. <br /> <br />In the event that the City assumes full responsibility for a service not currently being <br />provided by the City within its incorporated city limits, but being provided by a <br />separate County taxing agency or special district within the territory proposed for <br />annexation, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 99(b), the City shall receive, in <br />addition to the allocation determined in A above, an allocation of computed property <br />tax revenue equivalent to the share of property tax revenue received by the County <br />taxing agency or special district in the territory proposed for annexation. <br /> <br />D. The County shall receive an allocation of computed property tax revenue equivalent <br /> to its current share of property tax revenue in the territory proposed for annexation <br /> <br /> <br />