Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br /> ~TATE: OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> APPROVED AS TO FORI <br /> <br />,, <br />WILLIAM A, HIRS¥, Oity Atton <br />Oate-~j~L.~ <br /> <br /> [:~b~LUTIONNO. 68-157 <br /> <br />AUTHORIZING CITY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST <br />RIChaRDS TRUCKING COMPANY IF NEGOTIATIONS FAIL <br /> <br />WHEREAS: It appears that as a non-conforming use Richards Truckin <br /> Company is in violation of the Comprehensive Zoning <br /> Ordinance to the extent that said non-conforming use has <br /> been expanded without a permit having been granted; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS: Ordinance 520 requires that violations thereof be cor- <br /> rected by the City Attorney at the direction of the City <br /> Council; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE,' BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> 1. That the City Attorney be authorized and directed to <br /> investigate the possibility of instituting a citation <br /> procedure through the District Attorney's Office against <br /> the owner or operator of Richards Trucking Company, or <br /> that he file suit in the Superior Court of Alameda County <br /> seeking to abate Richards Trucking Company as a nuisance <br /> to the extent that its non~oonforming use has been illeg- <br /> ally expanded; either or both said remedies to be pursued <br /> in the event that negotiations between the City and <br /> Richards Trucking Company, seeking a voluntary abatement <br /> of the operations of Richards Trucking Compan~ break down <br /> <br /> 2. If either of the above remedies are pursued, the City <br /> Attorney is authorized and directed to pursue them in <br /> such a way as to be without prejudice to the City's right <br /> to institute further proceedings if it appears that the <br /> <br /> <br />