Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION N0.7~-20 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />PLEASANTO~SUPPORTING THE ENACTMENT OF FEDERAL <br />LEGISLATION WHICHWIL~ NULLIFY THE MANAGEMENT <br />OFPARKING SUPPLY AND THE PREFERENTIAL BUS/ <br />CARPOOL L~NES PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA <br />TRANSPORTATION CONTROL PLAN PROMULGATED BY <br />THE FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br />ON NOVEMBER 12, 1973~ AND POSTPONE FURTHER <br />SUCH REGULATIONS UNTIL CONGRESS REVIEWS AND <br />APPROVES A STUDY INCLUDING THE ECONOMIC IMPACT <br />OF SUCH REGULATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE METHODS <br />OF VEHICLE MILE REDUCTION. <br /> <br />the Council of the City of Pleasanton vigorously <br />supports the Objectives Of the 1970 CIean Air Act and <br />all efforts to implement such objectives towards <br />cleaning up the environment; and <br />the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <br />promulgated certain regulations on November 12, 197B, <br />entitled the California Transportation CCmtro,~ Plan; <br />and <br />the California TraBsportation Control Plan contains <br />within its provisions regulations which would create <br />and impose both economic and administrative chaos in <br />and upon the public and private comunities of the <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton and elsewhere in the State of <br />California; and <br />the City of Pleasanton, along with 180 other petitioners <br />in the State of California, including 8 counties and <br /> <br />67 other cities, has filed with the federal Court of <br />Appeals for the Ninth Circui~ ,PetitiOns for ReView, <br />which petitions challenge both the constitutional as <br />well as statutory authority for, said EPA regulations; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br /> <br />