My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00111A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00111A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2008 11:32:27 AM
Creation date
9/11/2000 9:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2000
DOCUMENT NO
RES 00111
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c. Pleasanton adopted a fmding of overriding considerations in approving its <br />1996 General Plan for impacts growth would have on regional transportation systems. <br />This project is consistent with the planned growth contemplated at that time. <br />C. Air Quality <br />1. lmpac[ Kl. Construction activities during mass grading would generate dust and <br />PM-10, creating the potential for nuisance. <br />Mitieation Measure: <br />Measure Kl. Prepare and implement a dust control plan for the construction period, <br />which would control dust during all phases of construction, to be reviewed and <br />approved by the City Public Works Department prior to development activity on the <br />site. <br />Findine: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible project <br />alternatives identified in the Final EIR which would reduce this impact to a less than <br />significant level. <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br />a. A comprehensive dust control plan, as described above under the Finding for <br />Impact Kl, is the only method available for controlling dust. Feasible mitigation <br />measure Kl has been incorporated into the GHCBI Project. <br />b. Given the amount and distribution of development under all of the <br />alternatives, except the No Project Alternative and No Golf Course Altemative, <br />analyzed in the EIR, mass grading would be required to develop the site, resulting in <br />the same impact. These Altematives are rejected because they would not meet any of <br />the Project Sponsor's objectives nor would it fulfill any of the Ciry's objectives for this <br />site, including provision of additional housing, open space, affordable housing, an <br />elementary school site and public improvements. While the amount of grading has <br />been reduced due to the reduction in residential units as part of the GHCBI Project (as <br />opposed to the Preferred Plan or the Cooperative Plan), dust generation will still occur. <br />c. Pleasanton has adopted a finding of overriding considerations in approving <br />its 1996 General Plan for air quality impacts. The GHCBI Project is consistent with <br />the growth contemplated at that time. <br />55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.