Laserfiche WebLink
Regarding the purchase of the site for the park, staff feels that the program is <br />presented to clearly show that a revenue source to purchase the site has not yet <br />been identified. However, staff is expecting to present Council with a report and <br />recommendation on this matter within the next few months. Additionally, the CIP <br />clearly states that no expenditures will be made for the purchase of the property <br />until a financing plan has been approved by the City Council. <br />As a result of the above, staff recommends maintaining the presentation of the <br />North Pleasanton Community Park as stated in the CIP. If the Council deems it <br />appropriate to not show revenue for this project, staff recommends that it continue <br />to track the park dedication fees from the two projects mentioned previously to <br />assure that they are segregated from other revenue to assure that it is not applied <br />to another project. <br />2. Funds earmarked for the Pleasanton Tennis and Community Park/Phase III, <br />should be allocated to the proposed Community Pool project to reflect the <br />pools high priority status. Based upon projected park dedication fee revenue and <br />the time lines required to complete these two projects, they both should be able to <br />move forward simultaneously. However, while a total of one million dollars is <br />allocated to each of these projects in 1994/95, only a small portion of that money <br />(less than $300,000) will actually be spent during the year. The remainder is <br />allocated to create a reserve to meet future project costs. As a result, should <br />actual revenues fall short of revenue projections to the point that it is not possible <br />to fund both projects, the Council will have the opportunity to transfer the majority <br />of the revenue currently allocated for the Pleasanton Tennis and Community <br />Park/Phase III to the Community Pool project as part of the 1995/96 or 1996/97 <br />CIP review if deemed appropriate. As a result, staff recommends that the <br />Community Tennis and Community Park/Phase III remain as presented in the CIP. <br />3. The golf course should be shown as a high priority project. The Municipal <br />Golf Course is currently listed in the "Other Unfunded" category to reflect the fact <br />that there is not yet a complete golf course plan or financial strategy established <br />for this project. However, if deemed appropriate by the Council, this project can <br />be moved to the "High Priority" category. If the Council is interested in this <br />option, the appropriate action would be to include this project as a high priority <br />unfunded project as part as the motion adopting the CIP and staff will amend the <br />attached resolution approving the program to reflect Council's action. <br />4. Increase funding for park play equipment from $28,500 to $50,000. As <br />presented in the CIP, the Miscellaneous Projects category, which includes the park <br />play equipment, has a projected ending year balance for FY 1994/95 of $1,988.00. <br />SR94: 242 3 <br />