My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00059
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2005 4:54:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2000 12:00:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2000
DOCUMENT NO
00059
NOTES
TRI-VALLEY
NOTES 3
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. Updated Recommended Improvement Plan <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION OEMAND MANAGEMENT (JDM) <br /> <br />While the TVfC supports TDM measures, it does not want to base the Plan on unrealistic <br />TDM goals that are supported by feasible programs. Through the plan process, the Bay <br />Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)-mandated average vehicle ridership <br />(AVR) of 1.35 was tested. This applies to employers with 100 or more employees. The <br />TVTC estimated that such large employers make up only about 10 percent of all employ. <br />ment. This, coupled with the fact that commute trips make up abom 35 percent to 40 per- <br />cent of the PM peak-hour traffic stream, means that the BAAQMD mandate will have neg. <br />ligible impact on traffic levels. <br /> <br />The TVTe also investigated the impact of achieving an A VR of 1.35 for all employers, <br />throughout the Bay Area, large and small. Compared to the "ambient" AVR of 1.10-1.15, <br />this would be a 20 percent improvement. Given the commute trip proportion of total p~ <br />peak-hour traffic, a 20 percent increase in A VR would translate into seven percent to eight <br />percent less traffic on the roads. While this would create a significant improvement in op- <br />erations, it would not significantly reduce the need for road building. Nevertheless, if at <br />least a 10 percent increase in A VR were not achieved, additional intersection improve- <br />ments, beyond what are included in the plan, would probably be necessary. <br /> <br />The achievement of a 20 percent increase in A VR would not be easy. The TVTC believes <br />that this would require a significant increase in the cost of solo commuting. 111e TVTC, <br />however, is not in favor of parking charges. Gasoline rax increases would be more accept- <br />able, provided they were levied region-wide (including San Joaquin County). Gas tax in- <br />creases would encourage commute alternatives and would provide more money for trans- <br />portation improvements. <br /> <br />The Plan is based on a more-achievable goal of an average 10 percent increase in AVR for <br />all employers. This increase would be realized through the adoption and enforcement of <br />local trip reduction ordinances. The 10 percent increase in AVR will bring some of the in- <br />tersections otherwise projected to be borderline unacceptable hack into compliance with <br />the TSOs, <br /> <br />Road Improvement Plan <br /> <br />The TVTPjAP includes many road improvement projects. These projects were developed <br />by the member jurisdictions of the TVTC. Projects range from intersection modifications to <br />freeway improvements and. new roads. The resulting system would provide good circula- <br />tion within the Tri-Valley. Figure 7-1 shows the planned roadway system. Figure 5-2 in <br />Chapter 5 shows the planned changes to freeway interchanges. Details on planned inter- <br />section lane configurations are included in the Technical Appendix. A detailed listing of the <br />planned roadway improvements is shown in Table 7-1. <br /> <br />18 April 2000 <br /> <br />Page 25 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.