Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. Updated Recommended Improvement Plan <br /> <br />2. Proposed modification to the Action Plan that will prevent the General Plan amend- <br />ments from adversely affecting the regional transportation netwotk. <br /> <br />If neither of these can be done, approval of the General Plan amendment may lead to a <br />finding of non-compliance with the Growth Management Program. <br /> <br />General Plan Cansistency with Cantra Costa Action Plans <br /> <br />The Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance will be based on adopted General <br />Plan land uses, the existing road network, and planned improvements to the network. Con- <br />sistency with the Action Plans must be established for any changes to the General Plan may <br />significantly reduce the ability of the facility to meet the TSOs. The RTPC will be responsi. <br />ble for establishing the type and size of amendment that will require review by the RTPC <br />and the process fat implementing this review. Approval of a General Plan amendment <br />found to be inconsistent with the adopted Action Plans may render the jurisdiction ineligi- <br />ble for Local Street and Maintenance Improvement Funds from the CCTA. <br /> <br />Consistency with the Action Pla.ns can be achieved by revising the proposed amendment, <br />adopting local actions to offset impacts to the Route of Regional Significance, or Council <br />or Board denial of the amendment. <br /> <br />Jurisdictions in the Tri-Valley may implement a proactive Growth and Congestion Man- <br />agement Strategy once a detailed growth management study has been conducted. The study <br />should indicate the development reductions, land use density reductions, or other types of <br />growth management or control that would be required for each applicable Tri-Valley juris- <br />diction to achieve TSOs. Any development reduction should be proportional to the traffic <br />distribution percentages for each jurisdiction. Also, the impact of this development reduc- <br />tion to traffic impact fees should be analyzed. All jurisdictions will then review this infor- <br />mation and know exactly how much reduction in development or growth management or <br />control is needed to meet the TSOs. <br /> <br />JOBS.HOUSING BAlANCE <br /> <br />One of the most important strategies for linking land use and transportation is jobs-housing <br />balance. In theory, the more workers can either find affordable, attractive housing close to <br />their jobs, or a job that matches their skills and income needs near their place of residence, <br />the more rhey can shorten the length and duration of their journey to work. Studies have, <br />in fact, shown that a greater jobs-housing balance can shorten work trips, reduce the over- <br />all number of work trips and encourage more walking trips. <br /> <br />In addition, since commute patterns in "imbalanced" areas are now highly directional, <br />adding new jobs could encourage commuting in the direction where capacity remains. This <br /> <br />18 April 2000 <br /> <br />Page 23 <br /> <br />r <br />