My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00059
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2005 4:54:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2000 12:00:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2000
DOCUMENT NO
00059
NOTES
TRI-VALLEY
NOTES 3
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. Updated Recommended Improvement Plan <br /> <br />Ramp metering controls the volume of traffic entering a freeway so the system is as effi- <br />cient as possible. As congestion on a freeway increases, the number of vehicles that the <br />freeway can carry decreases. Although a single freeway lane can carry around 2,200 vehi- <br />cles per hour under optimal conditions, as demand exceeds those optimal conditions, the <br />volumes carried actually drop. Under congested conditions, travel lanes have been observed <br />to carry only around 1,600-1,700 vehicles per hour. One source of this congestion is the <br />"turbulence" caused by the merging of vehicles at freeway ramps. By smoothing out this <br />merging, ramp metering can help make the flow of traffic on the freeway lanes more effi- <br />cient and thus increase the volumes and speeds. A survey made for the Federal Highway <br />Administration of seven ramp metering systems in the United States and Canada revealed <br />that average highway speeds increased by 29 percent after installing ramp metering and <br />travel times decreased 16.5 percent. At the same time reductions of freeway congestion av- <br />eraged approximately 60 percent. An analysis of the FLOW system in Seattle (ramp me- <br />tering and HOV lanes) revealed that in addition to similar improvements in speed and <br />travel time, highway throughput increased from 12 to 40 percent as a result of ramp me- <br />tering. An additional benefit from ramp metering is a decrease in the accident rate. Reduc- <br />tions from 20 to 58 percent have been achieved through improved merging operations. <br /> <br />Ramp meters can also encourage the peak spreading that needs to occur to keep the gate~ <br />ways flowing. This happens because motorists are willing to accept only up to about a 10~ <br />minute wait at the meters. Beyond that, they will adjust their trip making (i.e., choose to <br />travel at a different time or choose a different mode). This peak spreading helps to get the <br />most out of the system when gateway constraints are a reality. <br /> <br />In addition, when combined with HOV bypasses, ramp metering can provide an additional <br />powerful incentive for carpooling and can help buses increase average speeds. When com. <br />billed with HOV lanes on the freeways, the ramp metering-with-bypass system allows car- <br />pools and buses to achieve real travel time advantages compared to single-occupant vehi. <br />cles. <br /> <br />Ramp metering has two potential drawbacks: backups on the local street system and re. <br />warding long-distance commuters. The potential for backups on local streets can be mini- <br />mized through ramp widening and strategic placement of the meters. Where these mitiga- <br />tion measures are not possible, ramp metering can significantly reduce levels of service ad- <br />joining intersections and along adjacent streets. The risk of rewarding long-distance com- <br />mutes can be minimized by instituting a system of ramp metering for the entire length of a <br />freeway, rather than in isolated locations. <br /> <br />The TVTP/AP supports ramp metering with HOV bypass only where it will not seriously <br />impact local streets and where local implementation is tied with implementation along all <br />of 1-680 and 1-580 in neighboring communities. <br /> <br />18 April 2000 <br /> <br />Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.