My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 74215
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
RES 74215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2001 7:55:30 PM
Creation date
4/5/2000 6:39:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/4/1974
DOCUMENT NO
RES 74215
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CI~Y OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNtrY OF ALAIx~EDA <br />STATE Ol~' CAI,IFOKNI2X <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 74-215 <br /> <br />RE: LAS POSITAS - £.iEW TOWN <br /> <br />WHEREAS, t};e City Council of the City of Pleasanton, by Resolution iqo. 74-14, <br /> has previously taken a position on the establishment of a new town, <br /> north of the City of Livermore, referred to as the City of <br /> Positas, ss follows: <br /> <br /> Section 1. The City of P] easanton supports the position that the <br /> '!Spheres of Influence" for existing co~m~unities should inclnde all <br /> urban development udjacent to the Va]Iey Communities which is <br /> logically related to future growth of the Cities of Pleasanton <br /> and Livermore, and based on this philosophy, believes that the <br /> proposed new town of Los Positas should be included within the <br /> ~Spberes of Influence~ of nhe City ~f Liverh~ore. <br /> <br /> Section 2. The City Council of the City of Pleasanton snpports <br /> the policy of the Local Agency Formation Commissiun t~at the <br /> priorities for annexation of governmental entities should occur <br /> in the following order: <br /> <br /> a. Annexation to a city, rather than a special district, if both <br /> <br /> can provide the same services at approximately t]~e same cost <br /> of environmental impact. <br /> <br /> b. Znne:~ation to a distr~et or a city rather than the formation <br /> of a new special district or c~ty. <br /> <br /> c. Fearmotion of a new political entity is the ]ast a]ternative. <br /> <br /> ~.~tenever a new political or ta~ing entity ~s lnd~cate~, the <br /> for~x~ation of a self-Zoverning special district is the ]east <br /> .Je~ irab] e. <br /> <br /> Section 3. The Counci] js of the opinion that it has been the <br /> pod;it:ion of the City C:ouncil and of the various agencies in the <br /> iiver~ore-~nador Valley that said Valley conid sopport only three <br /> co,smunities, the City of P]easanton, the City of Livermore, <br /> that portion of the Va~lley Community Services District withi~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.