Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />i3. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the proposed annexation will pennn axe logical and efficient provision of essenuai <br />murncioal r~pe services to the territon, bv the Citv of Pteasan~on; <br /> <br />That affec',ed local agencies have given their ~Tmen assurance ~s to their ability to provide said <br />municipal services: ' <br /> <br />That the subject terntory is inhabited pursuant to the Conese-Knox .Act as iT contains 235 <br />registered voters as of the date of this hearing: <br /> <br />That. in accordance with the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code section 99. the City of <br />Pleasanton by Resolution dated September 15. 1998 and the County of Alameda bv Resoiution <br />dated November 17. 1998 have reached agreement on an exchange o~ propenS' tax revenues: <br /> <br />That the change of organization proposal is consistent with the adopted General Plan and <br />Specific Plan of the City of Pleasanton: <br /> <br />That the Ci:y of Pleasanton has prezoned the territory in conformance with Commission policy: <br /> <br />That the factors a.s set forth in Government Code section 56841 have been reviev,'ed and <br />considered 35' the Commission: <br /> <br />That the City of Pleasanton's Plan For .Municipal Sen'ices contains all of the requisite <br />information as required by Government Code section 56653 and has been considered and found <br />adequate 35' this Commission and is incorporated herein by reference; <br /> <br />That the froposed annexation is consistent with the orderly, planned and efficient urban <br />developm~.,z.t of the area and consistent with the City of Pleasanton's Urban Gro~h Boundan, <br />line; ' <br /> <br />That while :his proposal can reasonably be expected to lead to the conversion of existins, open <br />space pursuant to Go',ernment Code section 56377 it's presen'afion would not promote the <br />pined. orderly. ef~iiem development of the area: <br /> <br />That less than 100% of the propen.',' o~ners xn the proposed territory have given their consent to <br />this annexation: <br /> <br />That the boundaries of the proposed territor2,., are definite. consistent and appropriate and that no <br />islands or corridors of unincorporated territoB., are created: <br /> <br />'l'hat the policies. findings and mitigation measures as set forth in the adopted Cikv of Pleasanton <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan and General Plan are herein incorporated by reference: <br /> <br />That an Environmental Impact Report for the Happy Valley Specific Plan was prepared and <br />certified by the City of Pleasanton. as lead agency. and the annexation of areas are within the <br />scope of the Final EIR; and <br /> <br />That the Ci:y of Pleasanton adopted EIR was reviewed and considered by this Commission prior <br />to action on this proposal. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />