My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 77066
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RES 77066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2001 7:55:30 PM
Creation date
3/22/2000 5:41:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/28/1977
DOCUMENT NO
RES 770669
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U <br /> <br />B-2 <br /> <br /> B. Environmental Setting may include existing energy supplies <br /> and energy use patterns in the region and locality. <br /> <br /> C. Environmental Impacts may include: <br /> <br /> 1. The proJect's energy requirements and its energy use <br />efficiencies by amount and fuel type for each stage of the proJect's <br />life cycle including construction, operation, maintenance and/6r' <br />removal. If appropriate, the energy intensiveness of materials <br />may be discussed. <br /> <br /> 2. The effects of the project on local and regional <br />energy supplies and on requirements for additional capacity. <br /> <br /> B- The effects of the prOJect on peak and base period <br />demands for electricity and other forms of energy. <br /> <br /> 4. The degree to which the project complies'with existing <br />energy standards. <br /> <br /> 5- The effects of the project on energy resources. <br />D. Mitigation Measures may include: <br /> <br /> 1. Potential measures to reduce wasteful, inefficient and. <br />unnecessary consumption of energy during construction, operation, <br />maintenarceand/or removal. 'The discussion should explain why <br />certain measures were incorporated in t~e project and ~hy other <br />measures were dismissed.- .. <br /> <br /> 2. The potential of siting, orlenta.tion, and. design to minimize <br />energy consumption.- <br /> <br />systems. <br /> <br />The potential for reducing peak energy demand. <br /> <br />Alternate fuels (particularly renewable ones) o'r energy. <br /> <br /> 5. Energy conBervatlon which could result from recycling <br />efx'orts. <br /> <br /> E. Alternatives should be compared in terms of overall energy <br />consumption and in terms oi' reducing wasteful, mnefficient and <br />unuecessary cons~ap~ion of energy. <br /> <br /> F. Unavoidable Adverse Effects may include wasteful, inefficient <br />and unnecessary consumption of energy during ~he project construction, <br />operation, maintenance and/or removal that cannot be feasibly <br />mitigated. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.