Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 80-111 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO <br />ASK ALAMEDA COUNTY COUNSEL TO PROVIDE DEFENSE IN THE <br />CASE OF SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON, et al <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />a complaint was served on the City of Pleasanton on April <br />12, 1980, in the matter of Sears, Roebuck and Company, v. <br />County of Alameda, City of Pleasanton et al, for a refund <br />of taxes assessed and collected; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />Revenue and Taxation Code §5148 provides that defense of <br />such actions can be provided by the counsel for the County <br />or by the counsel for the City; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its meeting of April 22, 1980, the City Council received <br />a report from the City Attorney recommending that he be <br />authorized to formally request the County to provide defense <br />in this law suit; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. Authorizes the City Attorney to formally request Alameda <br /> County Counsel to provide defense in the lawsuit filed by <br /> Sears, Roebuck and Company v. County of Alameda, City of <br /> Pleasanton, eta!. <br /> <br />Section 2. This resolution shall be effective immediately. <br /> <br />THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON APRIL 22, 1980, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Kephart and Wood <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br /> % <br /> <br />By Doris George, Deputy City Clerk <br /> <br />APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br /> <br />vn,torney <br /> <br /> <br />